Via: NMEBloc Party frontman Kele Okereke doesn't think too kindly of White Stripes/Raconteurs frontman Jack White. Speaking to the NME, Okereke said that White was shirking his responsibility to speak out on public matters:
"I was amazed when Jack White said it wasn't his job to be critical about foreign policy because he was being paid to be an entertainer. I thought that was treacherous because it's complicit with the capitalist society.
"Selling more records is the only thing that's important to him not provoking debate."
Harsh words. While I can certainly empathize with Okereke's view that entertainers have a platform to speak out on important issues, I hardly find it "treacherous" or purely capitalistic to decide you don't want to air out your politics in public. What's everyone else think? Is there an inherent responsibility as an entertainer to try and make the wolrd a better place? Leave some comments below.
Bloc Party »

The White Stripes »

I agree with your assessment Justin. Like Charles Barkley once said, "I am not a role model." These words can be interpreted in many different ways, but the way I took them was that he was being paid to entertain people and he didn't feel a responsibility to a broader public. Although we put musicians (and athletes) on pedestals, some wish to remain private in some matters, however miniscule those matters may be. I respect White's decision not to air out his political standings, and Okereke was out of line to use the words he did.