The Killers

"Four Winds" (Bright Eyes Cover) (Audio)

Just when a Noisettes cover had me convinced that maybe I had been a bit too tough in my vehement dislike of the Killers, there comes this abomination--a cover of Bright Eyes' pretty awful " Four Winds " by the Las Vegas foursome that tosses out the song's honky tonk affectations (probably rightly) and replaces them with shoddy synth-pop posing (like everything off Day & Age ).

 

The cover is ostensibly for the "Spaceman" EP (which is out on April 14) but is clearly here solely so Brandon Flowers can try to be taken as seriously as a songwriter by the music press (well, like Paste, Filter, and Rolling Stone, I guess) as Conor Oberst. That won't work, given that this song is pretty much the pits--there's no sense of drama, no sense of caring at all about the source material, and no sense that this cover is essential. Which, at least in my book, is required in when it comes to covers.[ Stereogum ]   

Posted in: THE KILLERS

Rate this Track

Stumble It!
 

10 Responses

March 27, 2009 at 2:46 p.m.

How will he be taken seriously as a songwriter if it's a cover and someone else's lyrics? Was that supposed to be a joke? I don't even know man. Don't try to reevaluate your hate for the Killers because you're never going to be on their side- I can tell. Give in to the hate, revel in it, whatever.

March 27, 2009 at 3:05 p.m.

this song does sucks though....
this should be used as an example on how not to cover a song...
I usually don't mind the killers but this is S___T and a big big big one...
maybe someone should remind them that the 80's are long way gone.....

March 31, 2009 at 7:48 p.m.

the song DOES NOT suck
this cover certainly does, though
they took out the violin which is basically what makes four winds great

April 17, 2009 at 11:09 a.m.

Well you have to take into consideration of the time and era a song is covered. As the original (I prefer the killers cover) had a more upbeat tone even though the lyrics themselves were dark it seemed to work. The cover focues more on displaying the message of the lyrics rather than just making a tune. I like the song.

April 22, 2009 at 12:02 p.m.

I prefer the killer cover and I think people are being way too harsh. I have listened to the original many times but stilll prefer this one. I think people need to get over the fact that the killers have covered it and take it for what it is - a good cover.

April 30, 2009 at 12:11 p.m.

I love this cover. The original is awesome, but the cover is spectacular. Oh, Andrew I feel so bad for you. Go catch some swine you goof.

May 1, 2009 at 11:49 a.m.

This song is amazing. The lyrics have true meaning, and I being a fan of Bright Eyes, well Conor Oberst, and the Killers makes this a perfect cover.

And this isn't an 80's song.. by the way.

May 11, 2009 at 2:35 p.m.

DON'T like the killers, but I gotta admit this cover is pretty damn good. But I'm not a Bright Eyes fan at all so I could care less about the honky tonk original and people who whine about how it is murdering the original. It's plain as day that the Killers weren't trying to do the same thing BE was

September 20, 2009 at 4:39 p.m.

Heard song and instantly fell in love with it. I think both are great!! Connor Oberst did a good job with the lyrics, but Brandon Flowers does better as the voice of the song. I enjoy the violin in bright eyes. The keyboard in the killers version make it a little less depressing and upbeat and makes it their own, which you want to do when you cover any song.

November 20, 2009 at 11:09 p.m.

disgusting. what a tragedy. a true debasement of a great original.

Add a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
 

Prefix Logo

  Site Index RSS
Email or Username: Password: Register
Forum Posts