Al Franken loses by 0.02%?
(7 posts)
by Daba
10753 Posts |
1 year ago
http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSTRE4A48WH20081105 |
by andross
2369 Posts |
1 year ago
I voted for Franken. He's calling for a full recount to make sure there wasn't any problems with fraud. I heard from a friend at the University of Minnesota that they ran out of registration cards for people who were registering at the polls.
|
by Mike
1187 Posts |
1 year ago
bummer!
|
by infix
1 Posts |
1 year ago
Franken suffers from the notion that he CAN'T lose. He did.
Endless recounts that only find "new ballots" for him (and Obama) fall in the "Yea, that's it" category.
There have been hundreds of election recounts in recent years and there has NEVER been a case where all recounts add votes to ONLY one candidate.
Sounds like how my brothers and I used to play Monopoly. The banker, and nobody else, always seemed to get little surpluses. ... Hmm... Yea! That's it !!
Maybe Franken really isn't good enough, smart enough and dog gonne it... a few more people DON'T like him than his opponent. |
by Mike
1187 Posts |
1 year ago
I dont know what the point of the previous message was... Whos side are you on?
|
by Trackrabbit
951 Posts |
1 year ago
Infix, just so you know it wasn't Al FRankens decision to recount, it's Minnesota state law. And hundreds of recounts in recent years? At the national level? Really? Have any been this close?
Recounts are often just a last effort to win but it's hard to argue with a recount in a margin so incredibly close, you might wanna make sure.
And, I'm not sure where Obama comes into play. |
by dukkookim
482 Posts |
1 year ago
Al Franken is a smart dude but also pretty dang narcissistic and smug...kind of down the lines of Bill Maher but not as bad.
Whatever happened with this? Did they finish the recount? |
Post a Reply
Please login to post a reply.
by
by
by
by
by
by 